Our sense of touch connects us to the world around us and it is an integral part of how we experience things, both physically and emotionally. In the virtual world of remote-control robots, scientific models, or computer games, users generally lack tactile, or haptic,2 feedback, which either makes delicate manipulative tasks difficult or keeps the subject purely visual and often inscrutable (such as an electron microscope image of a nanoscale object). The desire for natural and intuitive human machine interaction has led to the inclusion of haptics in human–machine interfaces. The user is able to control inputs to the system through hand movements and in turn receives feedback through tactile stimulation in the hands. Sophisticated, state-of-the-art haptic user-interface software is capable of adding interactive, realistic virtual touch
capabilities to human–computer interactions. Among the uses are medical applications, remote vehicle or robotic control, military applications, and video games. Users are said to feel realistic weight, shape, texture, dimension, dynamics, and force effects. Applying the use of real-time virtual reality and multisensory user interface to nanoscience, scientists in France have begun to
open up the otherwise only scientifically described reality of the nanoworld to a nonscientific public.
‘‘A central challenge is how we can put our hands on scientifically explored parts of reality that cannot be reached by our senses and whose rules are completely foreign to our representation of reality,’’ Joe¨ l Chevrier tells us. ‘‘Since science is full of abstract descriptions, it is hard to represent it in an easy way. But thanks to computer sciences and robotics we now have the necessary tools to use human senses to explore, in real time, model worlds as they are described by science, or even true reality when coupling these multisensory interfaces to real nanosensors and nanoactuators.’’
Chevrier, a professor at the Universite´ Joseph Fourier in Grenoble, France,together with his collaborators hopes to open up a completely new field for our perception. This new ‘playground’—using haptic, vision, and sound interfaces—is the world we live in; but explored at scales entirely foreign to everything we experience around us.
‘‘In the nanoworld simulacrum that we have begun to build, object identification will be based on the intrinsic physical and chemical properties of the probed entities, on their interactions with sensors, and on the final choices made in building a multisensory interface so that these objects become coherent elements of the human sphere of action and perception,’’ says Chevrier
In other words, we might be able to touch, feel, and interact with the nanoworld which otherwise is not open to our direct experience. Chevrier hopes that this will be a major step in helping nonscientists understand nanosciences and nanotechnologies. The scientifically described part of our reality—much of what mathematics, physics, or chemistry is about—is usually inaccessible to
people not trained in these subjects, i.e. to most of us. Opening up this part of reality to everybody could go a long way in creating interest in science education and science careers, and help a better-informed public to lead a more objective discussion on the pros and cons of nanotechnologies.
Rather than using the abstract descriptions and experiments of a classical science education, the French team has begun to use real-time virtual reality combined with a multisensory human–machine interface to allow the direct perception of and interaction with the nanoworld.‘‘One way to develop this extension of the sphere where our senses are efficient can be based on nanosensors and nanoactuators,’’ explains Chevrier.‘‘Another approach is to use virtual environments which can bring the nanoworld to us through real-time multisensory interfaces. This can dramatically enhance the possibilities for easy exploration of remote realities foreign to our senses and can trigger spontaneous motivation in users, similar to what we observe in video game players.
Chevrier and his team have built a virtual AFM and coupled it to an advanced haptic interface as well as a sonification and visualization system. The resulting instrument allows its user to experience contact of a surface at the nanoscale. About 10 000 people used this demonstrator during three exhibitions in Grenoble, Paris, and Geneva.
A central part of this concept is not a new idea. It actually goes back to the earliest days of experimental science: Galileo’s use of a telescope to observe the Moon and coming to the immediate conclusion that theMoon is Earth-like. As Galileo immediately emphasized, this dramatic change in the human representation of the universe is caused by direct use of senses technically extended by an instrument, and not by a posteriori rational demonstration.
‘‘Our proposal can be seen as a revival of this famous tale,’’ says Chevrier.‘‘There is a major difference, however. Two points can illustrate the need for new approaches in implementing the nanoscale in virtual environments
(1) As we gradually approach the nanoscale, continuous description no longer stands and the molecular, discontinuous structure of matter is revealed. Atomic scale is a radical rupture with our common experience that is based on the objective existence of isolated continuous objects.
(2) Can we manage to ‘see’ and ‘touch’ an electron, a particle that has a mass and an electric charge but has no classical spatial extension in the sense of a material sphere, although it is at the root of the stability of matter? In fact, seeing or touching an electron has no intrinsic meaning. Electronbased objects can, however, be created and our interaction with these unusual objects defined.’’
Almost all scientific data today is represented visually. That’s why we have all these amazing electron microscope images and artists’ impressions of nanoscale objects. That’s also why most people can’t really get a grip (literally) on scientific discoveries unless they result in a better TV set or more stain-resistant shirts. Enriching the visual component with interactive tactile and sound aspects, and wrapping the whole thing into a virtual reality environment, will give us a much richer and more real experience of these objects.
At the Center for Cognitive Ubiquitous Computing (CUbiC) at Arizona State University in the USA they have developed some interesting haptic visualization schemes. Many object features are easy to invoke in human memory and are presented through tactile cueing. There are, however, some features that are not primary haptic features but may contribute to further
knowledge of the object. One example is the weight of the object. At CUbiC they have developed a haptic visualization scheme for the presentation of weight. In this scheme, a user is able to bounce the virtual object off an imaginary surface. When the object hits back, it generates a vibrotactile stimulation analogous to its weight.
Even if technology will one day offer us sophisticated tools to explore the nanoworld with our senses, the question is whether we will be able to really grasp it. Imagine an atom. Chances are you are seeing a Nagaoka .
Figure 1.1 The classic atomic model created by Hantaro Nagaoka
In 1904, a Japanese physicist named Hantaro Nagaoka created the classic atom image with planet-like electrons orbiting around a nucleus.
This is the picture that many people have in mind—cute, but wrong. Reality at the atomic scale is much, much weirder: atoms are mostly empty space and the solid world we experience around us is an illusion. Timothy Ferris has described this nicely in his book Coming of Age in the Milky Way
‘‘A bar of gold, though it looks solid, is composed almost entirely of empty space. The nucleus of each of its atoms is so small that if one atom were enlarged a million billion times, until its outer electron shell was as big as greater Los Angeles, its nucleus would still be only about the size of a compact car parked downtown. The electron shells would be zones of insubstantial lightning, each a mile or so thick, separated by many miles of space. Nor, to return to the old classical metaphor, does a cue ball strike a billiard ball. Rather, the negatively charged fields of the two balls repel each other; on the subatomic scale, the billiard balls are as spacious as galaxies, and were it not for their electrical charges they could, like galaxies, pass right through each other
unscathed.’
So, while your ‘reality’ tells you that you are sitting in your chair right now as you are reading this, reality at the subatomic level means that you are not really in contact with your chair—thanks to the repulsion of the chair’s electrons and your own, you are actually floating on it at a height of a fraction of a nanometer. The point is that, even if we might have the tools one day to trulyexperience the nanoworld, its rules are so foreign to our human experience that we might not be able to comprehend it anyway.
Of course, this first instrument built by Chevrier’s team in Grenoble is more Galileo telescope than Hubble space observatory. But it is an interesting beginning that one day might result in virtual worlds that will allow us to go all weird at the nanoscale.
Featured scientist: Joe¨ l Chevrier
Organization: Universite´ Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, France
Relevant publication: Implementation of perception and action at
nanoscale. Proceedings of ENACTIVE/07, 4th International
Conference on Enactive Interfaces, Grenoble, France, 19–22
November 2007.
Source
Nano-Society
www.rsc.org/nanoscience
capabilities to human–computer interactions. Among the uses are medical applications, remote vehicle or robotic control, military applications, and video games. Users are said to feel realistic weight, shape, texture, dimension, dynamics, and force effects. Applying the use of real-time virtual reality and multisensory user interface to nanoscience, scientists in France have begun to
open up the otherwise only scientifically described reality of the nanoworld to a nonscientific public.
‘‘A central challenge is how we can put our hands on scientifically explored parts of reality that cannot be reached by our senses and whose rules are completely foreign to our representation of reality,’’ Joe¨ l Chevrier tells us. ‘‘Since science is full of abstract descriptions, it is hard to represent it in an easy way. But thanks to computer sciences and robotics we now have the necessary tools to use human senses to explore, in real time, model worlds as they are described by science, or even true reality when coupling these multisensory interfaces to real nanosensors and nanoactuators.’’
Chevrier, a professor at the Universite´ Joseph Fourier in Grenoble, France,together with his collaborators hopes to open up a completely new field for our perception. This new ‘playground’—using haptic, vision, and sound interfaces—is the world we live in; but explored at scales entirely foreign to everything we experience around us.
‘‘In the nanoworld simulacrum that we have begun to build, object identification will be based on the intrinsic physical and chemical properties of the probed entities, on their interactions with sensors, and on the final choices made in building a multisensory interface so that these objects become coherent elements of the human sphere of action and perception,’’ says Chevrier
In other words, we might be able to touch, feel, and interact with the nanoworld which otherwise is not open to our direct experience. Chevrier hopes that this will be a major step in helping nonscientists understand nanosciences and nanotechnologies. The scientifically described part of our reality—much of what mathematics, physics, or chemistry is about—is usually inaccessible to
people not trained in these subjects, i.e. to most of us. Opening up this part of reality to everybody could go a long way in creating interest in science education and science careers, and help a better-informed public to lead a more objective discussion on the pros and cons of nanotechnologies.
Rather than using the abstract descriptions and experiments of a classical science education, the French team has begun to use real-time virtual reality combined with a multisensory human–machine interface to allow the direct perception of and interaction with the nanoworld.‘‘One way to develop this extension of the sphere where our senses are efficient can be based on nanosensors and nanoactuators,’’ explains Chevrier.‘‘Another approach is to use virtual environments which can bring the nanoworld to us through real-time multisensory interfaces. This can dramatically enhance the possibilities for easy exploration of remote realities foreign to our senses and can trigger spontaneous motivation in users, similar to what we observe in video game players.
Chevrier and his team have built a virtual AFM and coupled it to an advanced haptic interface as well as a sonification and visualization system. The resulting instrument allows its user to experience contact of a surface at the nanoscale. About 10 000 people used this demonstrator during three exhibitions in Grenoble, Paris, and Geneva.
A central part of this concept is not a new idea. It actually goes back to the earliest days of experimental science: Galileo’s use of a telescope to observe the Moon and coming to the immediate conclusion that theMoon is Earth-like. As Galileo immediately emphasized, this dramatic change in the human representation of the universe is caused by direct use of senses technically extended by an instrument, and not by a posteriori rational demonstration.
‘‘Our proposal can be seen as a revival of this famous tale,’’ says Chevrier.‘‘There is a major difference, however. Two points can illustrate the need for new approaches in implementing the nanoscale in virtual environments
(1) As we gradually approach the nanoscale, continuous description no longer stands and the molecular, discontinuous structure of matter is revealed. Atomic scale is a radical rupture with our common experience that is based on the objective existence of isolated continuous objects.
(2) Can we manage to ‘see’ and ‘touch’ an electron, a particle that has a mass and an electric charge but has no classical spatial extension in the sense of a material sphere, although it is at the root of the stability of matter? In fact, seeing or touching an electron has no intrinsic meaning. Electronbased objects can, however, be created and our interaction with these unusual objects defined.’’
Almost all scientific data today is represented visually. That’s why we have all these amazing electron microscope images and artists’ impressions of nanoscale objects. That’s also why most people can’t really get a grip (literally) on scientific discoveries unless they result in a better TV set or more stain-resistant shirts. Enriching the visual component with interactive tactile and sound aspects, and wrapping the whole thing into a virtual reality environment, will give us a much richer and more real experience of these objects.
At the Center for Cognitive Ubiquitous Computing (CUbiC) at Arizona State University in the USA they have developed some interesting haptic visualization schemes. Many object features are easy to invoke in human memory and are presented through tactile cueing. There are, however, some features that are not primary haptic features but may contribute to further
knowledge of the object. One example is the weight of the object. At CUbiC they have developed a haptic visualization scheme for the presentation of weight. In this scheme, a user is able to bounce the virtual object off an imaginary surface. When the object hits back, it generates a vibrotactile stimulation analogous to its weight.
Even if technology will one day offer us sophisticated tools to explore the nanoworld with our senses, the question is whether we will be able to really grasp it. Imagine an atom. Chances are you are seeing a Nagaoka .
Figure 1.1 The classic atomic model created by Hantaro Nagaoka
In 1904, a Japanese physicist named Hantaro Nagaoka created the classic atom image with planet-like electrons orbiting around a nucleus.
This is the picture that many people have in mind—cute, but wrong. Reality at the atomic scale is much, much weirder: atoms are mostly empty space and the solid world we experience around us is an illusion. Timothy Ferris has described this nicely in his book Coming of Age in the Milky Way
‘‘A bar of gold, though it looks solid, is composed almost entirely of empty space. The nucleus of each of its atoms is so small that if one atom were enlarged a million billion times, until its outer electron shell was as big as greater Los Angeles, its nucleus would still be only about the size of a compact car parked downtown. The electron shells would be zones of insubstantial lightning, each a mile or so thick, separated by many miles of space. Nor, to return to the old classical metaphor, does a cue ball strike a billiard ball. Rather, the negatively charged fields of the two balls repel each other; on the subatomic scale, the billiard balls are as spacious as galaxies, and were it not for their electrical charges they could, like galaxies, pass right through each other
unscathed.’
So, while your ‘reality’ tells you that you are sitting in your chair right now as you are reading this, reality at the subatomic level means that you are not really in contact with your chair—thanks to the repulsion of the chair’s electrons and your own, you are actually floating on it at a height of a fraction of a nanometer. The point is that, even if we might have the tools one day to trulyexperience the nanoworld, its rules are so foreign to our human experience that we might not be able to comprehend it anyway.
Of course, this first instrument built by Chevrier’s team in Grenoble is more Galileo telescope than Hubble space observatory. But it is an interesting beginning that one day might result in virtual worlds that will allow us to go all weird at the nanoscale.
Featured scientist: Joe¨ l Chevrier
Organization: Universite´ Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, France
Relevant publication: Implementation of perception and action at
nanoscale. Proceedings of ENACTIVE/07, 4th International
Conference on Enactive Interfaces, Grenoble, France, 19–22
November 2007.
Source
Nano-Society
www.rsc.org/nanoscience
No comments:
Post a Comment